![]() He said he had sold one and actually seen it running around. I talked to the guy who owns them and he told me their story and how he had gotten a good package deal. When I first saw them, there was a third one roosting with them. They have been setting in the same place for more than 15 years. When I used to commute I would see these cars every day. This beauty started as part of one of those plans. Sometimes we have grand plans for restoring these things. It wasn’t going to set any new land speed records, but it kept up with traffic and would cruise at any sane speed you might choose. Of course when you are comparing it to my 66 VW, anything is comfortable. I promise you, it was a comfortable travel car with as much luxury as I cared to have. I took many a trip from Connecticut to Maine in that car. He would like to thank all you taxpayers that paid for the facilities at the shipyard that he used to rebuild that engine. I had a friend when I was in Submarines that drove a 1958 model. You probably have your favorites, but mine were the 1958-1960 models. That can’t be good, can it? Well, some years just wore the bloat better than others. Tom’s article featuring that bloated baby Lincoln prompted me to look again.įor youngsters from my era who liked the Vettes and the 1955-57 ‘Birds, 1958 was the start of the Thunderbird’s bloat. There are a couple of ’59 T-Birds here locally that I looked at some time ago, but I couldn’t find the passion to generate an article. ![]() ![]() That may have been a good decision, but that would be an individual call. Ford thought they had a better idea when they stuffed a back seat in the ’58 model. When I saw Tom’s article on the ’74 Thunderbird I was reminded of why I quit liking Thunderbirds in general, and of the last one that I really did like.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |